Hypothetico-deductive Method of Scientific Investigation

It involves identifying a toughest problem, of a given field, to solve. 

Steps

1. Guess a solution/theory that might solve the problem.
2. List out all the consequences/predictions of one's theory. This step must clarify what one will not accept as a solution, i.e, constraints on potential solutions due to your theory.
3. Compare the actual evidence ( astronomy, genetics, archeology, geology, climates, botanical, etc) with the consequences/predictions of a theory. Recognize that we can never prove anything but we can falsify. 
4. The process continues for the remaining observations/evidences. 

A theory that survive numerous such tests and that explains more observations than any other theory is considered a better theory.  Then comes the criticism (rational criticism is what is meant by criticism) and this leads to further testing of a theory.The theory also leads to new problems of higher complexity and one may start the same cycle, using same methodology, in solving those newer challenging problems. The process is iterative.
 

Read more...